Template talk:Euro accession map

This template is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles

Numismatics

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles

The map is wrong

The map is wrong, Lithuania has joined the eurozone. The original svg file seems fine but the template has it wrong. Can someone fix it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.216.218.9 (talk) 09:55, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Poland is opt-out as seen on this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opt-outs_in_the_European_Union — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.70.211.226 (talk) 09:48, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's something about the size, 300px is wrong, 310px is ok... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.216.218.9 (talk) 10:00, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's just your cache. Next time try WP:BYPASS. TDL (talk) 18:49, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

efn name=status

@Danlaycock: In January 2016, you added a named footnote next to Kosovo but it is not defined anywhere. So everywhere this template is used gets an error unless coincidentally it has its own (irrelevant) footnote. Would you rectify asap, please? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 16:38, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I spot checked a few pages, and it seems to be properly working with the relevant footnote. See Montenegro and the euro for an example of proper usage.

The template was designed this way to avoid having duplicate footnotes created on the same page. Hence the footnote reference was defined in the template, but within noinclude tags. You could force the footnote reference to be included in translusions, but then you'd need to go through every page it's used on and remove the locally defined footnotes and ensure that they point to this template's footnotes, which is not going to be intuitive for users. Neither option is ideal.

I've updated the template documentation to describe what needs to be included on relevant pages, based on the current template design. TDL (talk) 05:29, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is evident at European Union law. I'll have a look at your doc later today but feel free to intervene first if you have a moment. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 08:45, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]